Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse

Part I. Argumentation Theory as a Discipline

1. Argumentation
Frans H. Eemeren, Sally Jackson, Scott Jacobs

2. The Language of Argumentation in Dutch
Frans H. Eemeren

3. In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics
Frans H. Eemeren

4. Bingo! Promising Developments in Argumentation Theory
Frans H. Eemeren

Part II. The Pragma-Dialectical Research Program

5. Argumentation Studies’ Five Estates
Frans H. Eemeren

6. The Study of Argumentation as Normative Pragmatics
Frans H. Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser

7. From Ideal Model of Critical Discussion to Situated Argumentative Discourse: The Step-by-Step Development of the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation
Frans H. Eemeren

8. The Case of Pragma-Dialectics
Frans H. Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser

9. The Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation Under Discussion
Frans H. Eemeren

Part III. The Dialectical Dimension of Pragma-Dialectics

10. Rationale for a Pragma-Dialectical Perspective
Frans H. Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst

11. In Reasonableness
Frans H. Eemeren

12. A Procedural View of Critical Reasonableness
Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser

13. A Pragma-Dialectical Procedure for a Critical Discussion
Frans H. Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst

Part IV. The Pragmatic Dimension of Pragma-Dialectics

14. Viewing the Study of Argumentation as Normative Pragmatics
Frans H. Eemeren, Bart Garssen

15. The Speech Acts of Arguing and Convincing in Externalized Discussions
Frans H. Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst

16. Rules for Argumentation in Dialogues
Frans H. Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst

17. For Reason’s Sake: Maximal Argumentative Analysis of Discourse
Frans H. Eemeren

Part V. Strategic Manoeuvring in Argumentative Discourse

18. Strategic Maneuvering: Maintaining a Delicate Balance
Frans H. Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser

19. Strategic Maneuvering: Examining Argumentation in Context
Frans H. Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser

20. Rhetoric in a Dialectical Framework: Fallacies as Derailments of Strategic Manoeuvring
Frans H. Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser

21. Strategic Maneuvering with the Burden of Proof
Frans H. Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser

22. Seizing the Occasion: Parameters for Analysing Ways of Strategic Manoeuvring
Frans H. Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser

23. A Pragmatic View of the Burden of Proof
Frans H. Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser

Part VI. Analysis as Reconstruction

24. Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse with the Help of Speech Act Conditions
Frans H. Eemeren, Bart Garssen

25. Analyzing Argumentative Discourse
Frans H. Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst

26. Analysis and Evaluation of Argumentative Discourse
Frans H. Eemeren, Bart Garssen

27. The Pragma-Dialectical Method of Analysis and Evaluation
Frans H. Eemeren

28. Making the Best of Argumentative Discourse
Frans H. Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst

Part VII. Fallacies in Argumentative Discourse

29. Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective
Frans H. Eemeren, R. Grootendorst

30. Fallacies as Derailments of Argumentative Discourse Acceptance Based on Understanding and Critical Assessment
Frans H. Eemeren

31. Linguistic Criteria for Judging Composition and Division Fallacies
Frans H. Eemeren, Bart Garssen

32. The History of the Argumentum Ad Hominem Since the Seventeenth Century
Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst

33. How to Respond to Fallacious Moves?
Frans H. Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser

Part VIII. Various Theoretical Issues

34. In Context Giving Contextualization Its Rightful Place in the Study of Argumentation
Frans H. van Eemeren

35. The Role of Logic in Analyzing and Evaluating Argumentation
Frans H. Eemeren

36. Dialectical Profiles and Indicators of Argumentative Moves
Frans H. Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans

37. Identifying Argumentation Schemes
Frans H. Eemeren, Tjark Kruiger

38. From Analysis to Presentation: A Pragma-Dialectical Approach to Writing Argumentative Texts
Frans H. Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst

Part IX. Experimental Research Concerning Argumentation

39. The Skill of Identifying Argumentation
Frans H. Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, Bert Meuffels

40. Student Performance in Identifying Unexpressed Premisses and Argumentation Schemes
Frans H. Eemeren, Kees Glopper, Rob Grootendorst, Ron Oostdam

41. The Extended Pragma-Dialectical Argumentation Theory Empirically Interpreted
Frans Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Bert Meuffels

42. Effectiveness Through Reasonableness: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective
Frans H. Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Bert Meuffels

43. The Disguised abusive ad hominem Empirically Investigated: Strategic Maneuvering with Direct Personal Attacks
Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Bert Meuffels

44. The Disguised ad baculum Fallacy Empirically Investigated. Strategic Maneuvering with Threats
Frans H. Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Bert Meuffels

Part X. Case Studies

45. Democracy and Argumentation
Frans H. Eemeren

46. In Varietate Concordia—United in Diversity European Parliamentary Debate as an Argumentative Activity Type
Frans H. Eemeren, Bart Garssen

47. Exploiting the Room for Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse Dealing with Audience Demand in the European Parliament
Frans H. Eemeren, Bart Garssen

48. Flexible Facts: A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis of a Burden of Proof Manipulation
Frans H. Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser

49. William the Silent’s Argumentative Discourse
Frans H. Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser

50. The Rhetoric of William the Silent’s Apologie a Dialectical Perspective
Frans H. Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser

51. Erratum to: Student Performance in Identifying Unexpressed Premisses and Argumentation Schemes
Frans H. Eemeren, Kees Glopper, Rob Grootendorst, Ron Oostdam

Nyckelord: Philosophy, Philosophy of Language, Philology, Classical Studies, Literacy, Logic